Wednesday, September 24, 2025

"Madharasi" Review: Sivakarthikeyan's Transformation Anchors AR Murugadoss' Mixed Bag Actioner

 Madharasi, directed by the veteran A. R. Murugadoss (Ghajiini, Thuppakki), is an ambitious psychological action thriller that attempts to blend a social message about gun violence with a deeply personal emotional core. While the film is hailed as a return to form for Murugadoss in terms of style, its uneven writing and overreliance on commercial clichés result in a mixed-to-positive critical reception.

DirectorA. R. Murugadoss
CastSivakarthikeyan, Rukmini Vasanth, Vidyut Jammwal, Biju Menon
GenrePsychological Action Thriller
Average Critic Rating3 / 5 Stars

The story introduces Raghuram "Raghu" (Sivakarthikeyan), a showroom employee struggling with severe suicidal thoughts after a breakup. He suffers from Fregoli Delusion, a rare psychological disorder rooted in childhood trauma, which causes him to mistake strangers for his lost loved ones. This delusion gives him a compulsive, life-risking urge to save others.

Raghu's path crosses with Premnath (Biju Menon), an NIA officer hunting an illegal North Indian arms syndicate, led by the ruthless Virat (Vidyut Jammwal) and Chirag (Shabeer Kallarakkal), who are attempting to flood Tamil Nadu with firearms. Prem, recognizing Raghu’s reckless "suicide mission" mentality as a weapon, manipulates him into infiltrating the syndicate's operation.

The film then becomes a high-octane battle driven by Raghu’s psychological trauma, the moral conviction of his former girlfriend Malathi (Rukmini Vasanth), and the NIA's desperate attempt to stop a looming crisis.

What Works: Transformation and Action

  • Sivakarthikeyan's Performance: SK delivers a robust performance in his first major, serious action avatar. Critics largely praised his commitment to playing a man driven by trauma, showcasing a convincing blend of vulnerability, emotional intensity, and a raw, animalistic fighting style that emerges in the climax.

  • A.R. Murugadoss's Return to Style: The film is visually slick, fast-paced, and showcases Murugadoss’s vintage knack for blending a social issue (gun culture) with a complex psychological element, reminiscent of Ghajini. The interval block and the climax action sequences are noted as whistle-worthy highs.

  • The Antagonists: Vidyut Jammwal and Shabeer Kallarakkal are convincing as menacing villains, providing a formidable physical and intellectual threat that matches the hero's intensity.

  • Strong Support: Rukmini Vasanth elevates the role of the love interest, giving Malathi emotional intelligence and justification for her role in Raghu's life.

What Doesn't Work: Clichés and Pacing

  • Uneven Screenplay: Despite the strong setup, the second half and the final climax feel cluttered and stretched, often sacrificing narrative depth for relentless, large-scale action set pieces.

  • Predictability and Plot Holes: The film falls into several commercial clichés. Critics pointed out numerous plot holes and instances of unnecessary "heroism" (Raghu taking too many punches) that stretch credulity.

  • Music Disappointment: Anirudh Ravichander’s soundtrack and background score were cited by some critics as repetitive and a missed opportunity to elevate the emotional beats of the film.

Final Verdict

Madharasi is a muscular, high-voltage action entertainer that works best as a vehicle for Sivakarthikeyan's successful transformation into an action star. While it suffers from an overly long second half and an ambition that the writing cannot always sustain, its strong performances, gripping premise, and excellent action choreography make it a worthwhile watch for fans of commercial Tamil thrillers.

Critic Rating: ⭐⭐⭐ (3/5 Stars)

"Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – The Movie: Infinity Castle" Review: Visual Masterpiece, Episodic Pacing

 Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – The Movie: Infinity Castle is a jaw-dropping cinematic spectacle that kicks off the highly anticipated Final Battle Arc. While Studio Ufotable delivers animation that is arguably the best in the medium, the film struggles to overcome the inherent structure of the manga, resulting in a thrilling but episodically paced feature.

DirectorHaruo Sotozaki
Cast (Voice)Natsuki Hanae (Tanjiro), Akari Kitō (Nezuko), Takahiro Sakurai (Giyu), Akira Ishida (Akaza)
Arc AdaptedFinal Battle Arc (Part 1 of 3)
Critic ConsensusGenerally Favorable (High marks for animation, low marks for pacing)

The Plot: A Descent into Chaos

The movie begins at the exact point where the previous season left off: the Demon Slayer Corps has been plunged into the ever-shifting, gravity-defying fortress of the Demon King, Muzan Kibutsuji—the Infinity Castle. Separated and surrounded by Muzan's elite Upper Rank demons, the film focuses on a series of critical, high-stakes battles:

  1. Shinobu vs. Doma (Upper Rank Two): A fatefully personal confrontation against the demon who killed her sister.

  2. Zenitsu vs. Kaigaku (Upper Rank Six): A duel of former disciples and adoptive brothers.

  3. Tanjiro & Giyu vs. Akaza (Upper Rank Three): A rematch for the protagonist, which forms the emotional core of the film.

What Works: The Unquestionable Spectacle

  • Best-in-Class Animation: The visuals are the film's undeniable star. Ufotable leverages the big screen format to render the Infinity Castle as an elaborate, M.C. Escher-esque labyrinth. The breathing techniques and fight choreography are vibrant, dynamic, and breathtakingly brutal.

  • Akaza's Story: The final battle, which focuses on Tanjiro, Giyu, and Akaza, is punctuated by an extensive flashback detailing Akaza's tragic human past (as Hakuji). This segment is universally praised as one of the most effective and emotional backstories in the entire franchise, granting the villain genuine depth and pathos.

  • High Stakes: The film successfully raises the bar for tension. Characters are separated, overwhelmed, and suffering real losses, immediately communicating that this is the beginning of the end for the Corps.

What Doesn't Work: The Episodic Structure

  • Pacing and Flashback Overuse: The single most consistent criticism is that the film feels less like a cohesive movie and more like a collection of highly polished TV episodes stitched together. Each of the three fights follows the same pattern—encounter, intense action, long flashback/exposition, conclusion—which makes the 155-minute runtime feel repetitive and severely undercuts the combat momentum.

  • Not for Newcomers: Due to its direct continuation from Season 4, the film offers virtually no introduction or recap, making it virtually incomprehensible for anyone not already versed in the series' lore and large cast.

  • Lack of a Movie Ending: As the first part of a trilogy, the film does not resolve the main conflict (Muzan's defeat), but rather ends with a victory that serves as a stepping stone, leaving some audience members feeling unfulfilled by the lack of a traditional feature film climax.

Final Verdict

Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle is a visual and emotional feast tailor-made for existing fans. You go for the pulse-pounding, gorgeously animated action, and you stay for the surprisingly heartbreaking character drama—especially Akaza's compelling arc. However, its slavish devotion to the manga's pacing and constant use of flashbacks make the narrative feel disjointed.

A stunning spectacle, but better enjoyed as an arc of the series than as a standalone cinematic experience.


Official Ratings Summary

SourceCritics Score (Approx.)Note
Rotten Tomatoes96% FreshPraised for animation, action, and fidelity to the source.
Metacritic69/100 (Generally Favorable)Reflects the split consensus: high technical quality vs. flawed structure/pacing.

"Mandala Murders" Review: An Ambitious Dive into Cults, Crime, and Mumbo-Jumbo

 Mandala Murders, the Netflix Hindi original series created by Gopi Puthran, is a visually dark crime thriller that blends modern police procedural with ancient Indian mysticism. While the show is rich in atmosphere and aims high with its ambitious plot, its execution is often muddled, leading to a mixed critical consensus.

Creator/DirectorGopi Puthran
CastVaani Kapoor, Vaibhav Raj Gupta, Surveen Chawla, Raghubir Yadav
GenreCrime Thriller, Occult Mystery, Suspense
Average Critic Rating2.5 / 5 to 3 / 5 Stars

The Plot: The Cult of Yast

Set in the fictional town of Charandaspur, the series is driven by the investigation of gruesome, ritualistic murders where dismembered body parts are arranged in a Mandala pattern. CIB officer Rea Thomas (Vaani Kapoor) teams up with suspended cop Vikram Singh (Vaibhav Raj Gupta) to uncover the Aayastis, a centuries-old cult dedicated to resurrecting a man-made god named Yast through horrific human sacrifices. The narrative juggles present-day chaos with 1950s flashbacks detailing the cult’s origins.

What Works: Atmosphere and Vaibhav Raj Gupta

  • Atmosphere and Visuals: The show's greatest strength is its stunning, dark, and gothic mood. The cinematography effectively captures the unsettling stillness of the town.

  • Vaibhav Raj Gupta: He provides the series with much-needed emotional depth and sincerity as the haunted Vikram Singh, proving to be the most compelling character.

  • Ambition: The core concept—blending cult lore, ancient geometry, and a gruesome ritual for a man-made god—is bold and unique.

What Doesn't Work: Cluttered and Convoluted Writing

  • Narrative Overreach: The plot is overstuffed with concepts and timelines, making the mystery overly complicated and often difficult to follow for the first few episodes. Critics felt the show becomes a "what-is-happening" rather than a "whodunit."

  • Uneven Lead Performance: Vaani Kapoor's performance, while having the presence of a protagonist, was frequently noted as lacking the necessary emotional grit and feeling "flat" or "expressionless."

  • Unearned Payoff: The ending and final revelations, though setting up a Season 2, failed to deliver a truly satisfying or cathartic conclusion, as the complex threads did not weave together coherently.

Final Verdict

Mandala Murders is a series that aims for the stars but struggles to land its complex execution. It is visually arresting and conceptually intriguing, but its lack of narrative discipline and emotional clarity prevent it from becoming a truly great Indian thriller.

Average Critic Rating: ⭐⭐½ to ⭐⭐⭐ (2.5/5 to 3/5 Stars)

"The Sandman" Season 2 Review: An Emotional, Epic Conclusion to Dream's Saga

 The Sandman Season 2 (released in two parts) brings Netflix’s ambitious adaptation of the iconic Neil Gaiman comic series to a close. Moving away from the episodic nature of Season 1, this season delivers a more focused, character-driven journey that culminates in a faithful and emotionally potent finale.

StarringTom Sturridge, Kirby Howell-Baptiste, Boyd Holbrook, Jenna Coleman, Mason Alexander Park
CreatorsNeil Gaiman, David S. Goyer, Allan Heinberg
Adapted StoriesSeason of Mists, Brief Lives, The Kindly Ones, The Wake

The Plot: The Road to Ruin

The season picks up with Dream (Tom Sturridge) facing the consequences of his actions, primarily the mercy-killing of his son, Orpheus. This act of "familicide" breaks an unbreakable rule of The Endless, summoning the unstoppable vengeance goddesses known as The Kindly Ones (The Furies), who mark Dream for death.

The central narrative then becomes a dual-track race against time:

  1. Dream's Final Journey: Dream attempts to right ancient wrongs, reunite with his siblings (including the introduction of Delirium and the search for Destruction), and ensure the safety of his kingdom, the Dreaming, before his inevitable demise.

  2. The Furies' Pursuit: Driven by the manipulation of Loki and Lyta Hall (the mother of Dream's chosen successor, Daniel), the Kindly Ones unleash a destructive rampage through the Dreaming, forcing Dream to confront his fate.

What Works: A Stirring Farewell

  • Tom Sturridge’s Evolution: Sturridge delivers his finest work as Morpheus. The season excels at showing the cold, rule-bound Dream wrestling with newfound guilt, grief, and a developing sense of humanity. His arc, which accepts that "to be alive comes with responsibilities beyond the rules," is the emotional core of the series.

  • The Focused Narrative: Unlike the anthological feel of Season 1, Season 2 is laser-focused on Dream's downfall and eventual rebirth. This narrative drive makes for a more consistently gripping watch, especially in the second, tightly-paced half.

  • The Ensemble: The season effectively brings back fan-favorite characters for moving goodbyes and final turns, notably the charming return of The Corinthian (Boyd Holbrook) in a new role, and memorable scenes featuring Death (Kirby Howell-Baptiste) and the chaotic duo of Loki (Freddie Fox) and Puck (Jack Gleeson).

  • Visual Fidelity: Despite the vast scope of the material, the show remains an "undeniable visual feast," with high production values and painstakingly detailed designs for the various realms and mythological figures.

What Doesn't Work: Uneven Pacing and Tone

  • Pacing in Vol. 1: The first part of the season, which adapts Season of Mists and Brief Lives, sometimes feels episodic and rushed, attempting to condense sprawling comic narratives into too few episodes.

  • Muted Tone: Some critics found the overall tone, particularly in the later episodes, to be overly somber and "maudlin," with the melancholy sometimes overshadowing the spontaneous humor of the original comics.

  • Loss of Nuance: In streamlining the story to center on Dream's fate, some of the complex, stand-alone stories that gave the source material its depth were either cut or condensed, leading to a loss of narrative breadth.

Final Verdict

The Sandman Season 2 concludes the saga of Dream on a powerful and profoundly emotional note. While it occasionally suffers from an overly reverent approach to its source material and some inevitable pacing issues, it successfully translates a seemingly un-adaptable comic into a stunning piece of television. The series is a testament to the power of stories, dreams, and the possibility of change, making it a fitting and resonant finale for the King of Dreams.

Rating: 4/5 Stars (A strong, satisfying, and beautiful conclusion.)

"Kiss" Tamil Movie Review: Kavin’s Fantasy Romance Charms, But the Writing Settles for a Peck

 Kiss, the directorial debut of National Award-winning choreographer Sathish Krishnan, attempts to deliver a fresh fantasy-laced romantic comedy. While the film sparkles with a unique premise and the natural charisma of its lead, it struggles to maintain momentum, ultimately proving to be a breezy, but uneven, romantic ride.

DirectorSathish Krishnan
CastKavin, Preethi Asrani, VTV Ganesh, RJ Vijay
GenreFantasy Romantic Comedy
Runtime143 Minutes
Rating (Average Critic)2.5/5 to 3/5 Stars

The film centers on Nelson Marcus (Kavin), a musician who harbors an aversion to love and commitment, largely due to his parents' divorce. Nelson accidentally comes into possession of a mysterious book, which grants him a bizarre supernatural ability: "Kiss Josiyam"—the power to see the entire romantic future of any couple the moment he witnesses them share a kiss.

To his dismay, his visions only predict tragic or heartbreaking separations. This drives him to try and break up couples. The narrative takes an urgent turn when he falls for Sarah William (Preethi Asrani), a dancer, and his vision for their future spells an impending doom. The rest of the film becomes a frantic race against destiny as Nelson attempts to rewrite fate to save the woman he loves.

What Works: Charm and Concept

  • Fresh Premise: The core concept of "kiss josiyam" is undeniably innovative for a Tamil romantic comedy. It introduces a clever "ticking clock" element that elevates the typical rom-com formula.

  • Kavin's Charisma: Kavin is the anchor of the film. He delivers a charming, natural performance, effortlessly balancing his character's initial arrogance with the vulnerability that emerges as he grapples with his power.

  • Breezy First Half: Director Sathish Krishnan establishes the supernatural premise and the comedic side-plots well, particularly leveraging VTV Ganesh and RJ Vijay for effective, lighthearted comic relief.

  • Technical Polish: The film has a visually appealing, polished aesthetic, and Jen Martin's music (especially the romantic tracks) is largely praised for enhancing the emotions without overpowering the scenes.

What Doesn't Work: The Uneven Writing

The film's ambitious concept is let down by uneven writing, particularly in the second half.

  • Lack of Emotional Depth: Critics noted a significant flaw in the character arcs. The film often tells the audience about Nelson’s emotional turmoil and change of heart rather than showing it convincingly. His transition from a love-hater to a devoted man feels abrupt and plot-driven rather than organic.

  • Pacing and Predictability: After a strong setup, the second half loses momentum, leaning on conventional romantic conflicts. The twists, while numerous, become repetitive, and the final emotional payoff feels unearned.

  • Underutilization: Several veteran supporting actors, including Devayani and Rao Ramesh, are underutilized, appearing in brief, one-note roles that waste their potential.

Final Verdict

Kiss is a fun, feel-good fantasy that delivers on its promise of breezy romance and unique comedy. Its biggest strength lies in its novel concept and Kavin’s amiable performance. However, inconsistent pacing and a screenplay that settles for convenience over emotional conviction prevent it from achieving the status of a truly memorable romantic classic. It's a sweet watch, but you may leave wishing the film had dug a little deeper.

A good one-time watch for fans of Kavin and lighthearted fantasy-romance.

"Alien: Earth" TV Series Review: A Dazzling, Philosophical, and Brutal Prequel

 The first-ever television series in the Alien franchise, "Alien: Earth," is a visually spectacular and ambitious expansion of the sci-fi horror universe. Set two years before the events of the original 1979 film, the series is praised for capturing the iconic, claustrophobic dread of the original while broadening its scope and philosophical depth.

The Plot and Premise

The series is set on a near-future Earth (2120) dominated by five powerful corporations, including Weyland-Yutani and the disruptive Prodigy Corporation. The core story is built around a "race for immortality," featuring three warring types of human/machine existence: Cyborgs, Synthetics (Synths), and a new group called Hybrids (synthetics with uploaded human consciousness).

The conflict explodes when the deep space research vessel USCSS Maginot crash-lands on Earth, unleashing not only the familiar Xenomorphs but also new, terrifying alien lifeforms. The story focuses on Wendy (Sydney Chandler), the first Hybrid, and her search for her human brother, Joe (Alex Lawther), as they confront the creatures and the corporate corruption that brought them to Earth.

What Critics Are Saying

The critical consensus for Alien: Earth is overwhelmingly positive, with many calling it the best entry in the franchise in a long time.

ConsensusHighlights
Prequel Done RightIt successfully honors the retro-futuristic aesthetic and palpable tension of the 1979 film while introducing entirely new concepts and lore. It feels both old-school and fresh.
Philosophical DepthCreator Noah Hawley uses the backdrop to explore complex themes of personhood, corporate hubris, and what defines humanity. Many critics note the humans—particularly the greedy tech-bro corporation Prodigy—are the real monsters of the series.
Horror and GoreIt delivers the visceral, bone-chilling imagery and merciless violence fans expect, including some truly gnarly, new alien lifeforms (like a parasitic eyeball creature) alongside the terrifying Xenomorph.
Cast & PerformancesThe ensemble is strong. Sydney Chandler earns praise for her transformation into a Ripley-esque heroine, while Samuel Blenkin is captivating as the unnervingly detached CEO, Boy Kavalier.

The Negatives

While highly praised, the show is not without its flaws:

  • Slow Burn: Some critics found the initial episodes dense and slow, suggesting it takes time to find its groove as it juggles multiple storylines and complex exposition.

  • Narrative Clutter: The show sometimes approaches Westworld levels of complexity, leaving some viewers bewildered by the sheer amount of new lore and philosophical detours.

  • Wobbly Canon: The presence of a mass Xenomorph outbreak on Earth in 2120 slightly strains the timeline leading up to the events of Alien in 2122, where the creatures are seemingly unknown.

Final Verdict

"Alien: Earth" is an ambitious, dazzling, and utterly terrifying piece of television. It's an atmospheric and meticulously crafted show that delivers on the horror while proving that the Alien franchise still has relevant, thought-provoking stories to tell. It’s a must-watch for sci-fi and horror fans.

Metacritic Score (Critics): 93% Positive (The consensus on Rotten Tomatoes and other sites is similarly high, although the user score is more mixed, indicating the show's complex nature may divide some viewers.)

"Mirage" Malayalam Movie Review: Jeethu Joseph’s Thriller Gets Lost in a Labyrinth of Twists

 


Mirage, the latest offering from celebrated thriller director Jeethu Joseph (Drishyam), promised a complex web of suspense, but ultimately struggles under the weight of its own ambition. While the film has a strong premise and earnest performances from its leads, its over-reliance on plot twists ultimately dilutes the narrative's tension.

DirectorJeethu Joseph
CastAsif Ali, Aparna Balamurali, Hakim Shahjahan, Sampath Raj
GenreCrime Thriller

The story centers on Abhirami (Aparna Balamurali), a young woman whose life is thrown into chaos after her fiancé, Kiran (Hakim Shahjahan), mysteriously dies in a train accident. Her grief soon turns into a desperate struggle for survival as various shady figures, including police and goons, approach her, all demanding a crucial hard disk that Kiran supposedly hid.

In her quest to find the hard disk and uncover the truth about Kiran's hidden life, Abhirami teams up with Aswin (Asif Ali), an online investigative journalist. The duo is quickly plunged into a complex world of financial fraud, identity theft, and mounting danger. The title itself—Mirage: Fades as you get closer—perfectly reflects the plot's tendency for illusion and confusion.

What Works: The Actors and the Pace

  • Lead Performances: Both Aparna Balamurali and Asif Ali deliver solid, committed performances, injecting life and a commendable chemical balance into characters that are often poorly written. Aparna convincingly portrays Abhirami's vulnerability and determination.

  • Initial Intrigue: The film starts quickly, plunging the audience straight into the mystery and establishing a compelling core premise that immediately sparks curiosity.

What Doesn't Work: Twist Overload

The film's biggest flaw is its execution, particularly in the screenplay, co-written by Jeethu Joseph and Srinivasan Abrol. Critics and audiences largely agree that Mirage sacrifices compelling storytelling for a relentless barrage of unearned plot reveals.

  • Twists for Twist's Sake: The narrative is so fixated on delivering one "shocking" twist after another (especially in the second half) that the surprises often land without any real emotional weight or logic, leaving the audience exhausted rather than thrilled.

  • "Telling, Not Showing": Much of the crucial plot information and character revelations are delivered through lengthy, stilted dialogue, rather than being organically uncovered through cinematic progression, a stark contrast to Jeethu Joseph's best works.

  • Underwritten Characters: Despite the actors’ efforts, many key characters, including the antagonists, feel one-dimensional or clichéd. Similarly, the roles for some supporting female characters are disappointingly minimal.

Final Verdict

Mirage is an ambitious thriller that seems to have confused complexity with competence. It has the basic framework of a gripping story but fails to build the necessary emotional stakes for the twists to truly matter. For die-hard fans of Jeethu Joseph's intricate style, it offers a single, moderately engaging watch, but it will likely be remembered as one of the director's less impactful thrillers.

Rating: 2.5/5 Stars (A passable thriller, but far from the quality expected of its director.)

Jolly LLB 3 Box Office Collection Report (As of Day 5)


MetricTotal Collection (Approx.)Note
Worldwide Gross₹ 101.50 CroreCrossed the ₹100 Crore mark in 5 days.
India Net Collection₹ 65.50 Crore
India Gross Collection₹ 78.50 Crore
Overseas Collection₹ 23.00 Crore

Day-Wise India Net Collection

The film registered a strong upward trend over the weekend, followed by the expected weekday dip and a subsequent boost on Tuesday.

DayDateIndia Net Collection (Approx.)
Day 1 (Friday)Sep 19, 2025₹ 12.50 Crore
Day 2 (Saturday)Sep 20, 2025₹ 20.00 Crore
Day 3 (Sunday)Sep 21, 2025₹ 21.00 Crore
Day 4 (Monday)Sep 22, 2025₹ 5.50 Crore
Day 5 (Tuesday)Sep 23, 2025₹ 6.50 Crore
Total (5 Days)₹ 65.50 Crore


Key Box Office Highlights:

  • Weekend Record: The film registered the biggest opening weekend for the Jolly LLB franchise, surpassing Jolly LLB 2.

  • Worldwide Success: It crossed the coveted ₹100 Crore worldwide mark within just 5 days of release.

  • Word-of-Mouth: The significant jump in collections on Saturday (Day 2) and the steady business on Tuesday (Day 5, which benefited from discounted ticket offers) indicate strong positive word-of-mouth.

  • Future Target: The film is now firmly set to challenge the lifetime domestic collection of its predecessor, Jolly LLB 2 (approx. ₹117 Crore net), and is on track to cross the ₹100 Crore India net benchmark.

Jolly LLB 3 Review: Double the Jolly, Triple the Fun, and a Courtroom MVP

 The gavel has dropped once again, and this time, the Jolly LLB franchise brings a showdown fans have been waiting for: the ultimate legal clash between the two most beloved small-town advocates. Directed by franchise creator Subhash Kapoor, Jolly LLB 3 is a cracking blend of hard-hitting social commentary, biting satire, and laugh-out-loud courtroom chaos.

The Case: Justice for the Farmer

Following the tradition of tackling real-world issues, Jolly LLB 3 centers on a deeply sensitive subject: farmer suicides and illegal land acquisition.

The plot is set in motion when Janki Rajaram Solanki (played with searing gravity by the legendary Seema Biswas), a farmer's widow, arrives in court seeking justice. Her husband died by suicide after losing his land to a powerful, dignified industrialist, Haribhai Khaitan (Gajraj Rao), who is pushing a massive development known as the "Bikaner to Boston" project.

This emotional and anti-establishment case pits the "Jollys" against each other, before forcing them to unite for the greater good.

The Duel: Akshay Kumar vs. Arshad Warsi

The film’s biggest selling point is the face-off between Akshay Kumar (Advocate Jagdishwar 'Jolly' Mishra) and Arshad Warsi (Advocate Jagdish 'Jolly' Tyagi).

  • Akshay Kumar is in his element, bringing the physical comedy and sharp, crowd-pleasing one-liners we've come to expect. He delivers the rousing courtroom monologue with conviction, perfectly suited to his character's more theatrical style.

  • Arshad Warsi operates as the subtle, dry-witted comic counterpoint. His restraint and impeccable timing make his quieter moments and exasperated reactions highly effective.

While the film struggles at times to give both protagonists equal footing—with Arshad Warsi's screen time feeling slightly minimized in the second half—their on-screen chemistry, born from an initial, hilarious rivalry, is undeniable when they click.

The Scene-Stealer: Judge Sunder Lal Tripathi

The true winner of the film, and the undisputed MVP of the franchise, is Saurabh Shukla as Judge Sunder Lal Tripathi.

Shukla outshines both titular actors, dominating every frame he enters. This time, his character isn't just the irritable, wisecracking spine of the courtroom; Kapoor has added delightful new layers. Judge Tripathi is now on a self-care journey, a fitness enthusiast, and even discovers the world of dating, leading to a surprisingly soft and hilarious romantic arc. His performance is an effortless masterclass and a major reason why the film feels fresh and entertaining.

Final Verdict

Director Subhash Kapoor successfully anchors the drama in reality while peppering the narrative with sharp satire and well-placed humor, including cheeky nods to real-life fugitives. While the movie follows the familiar beats of the franchise, and the strong supporting female cast (Huma Qureshi and Amrita Rao) are criminally underused, the core message hits hard.

Jolly LLB 3 is a potent, feel-good courtroom drama that makes you laugh, think, and cheer in equal measure. It proves that the franchise still matters, driven by strong performances and a compelling narrative that prioritizes the spirit of justice over the letter of the law. A must-watch for fans of the series and a hearty big-screen entertainer.

Rating: 3.5/5 Stars

Box Office Collection Report: Lokah: Chapter 1 - Chandra (As of Day 27)


Lokah: Chapter 1 - Chandra, the female-led superhero fantasy film rooted in Malayalam cinema and folklore, has achieved an All Time Blockbuster verdict, becoming a significant milestone in Indian cinema. The film has demonstrated exceptional performance both domestically and overseas.

Collection MetricTotal Collection (Approx.)Verdict
Worldwide Gross₹ 280.2 CrAll Time Blockbuster
India Net Collection₹ 140.25 Cr
India Gross Collection₹ 164.2 Cr
Overseas Collection₹ 116 Cr